Difference between revisions of "Ic-client"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''ic-client''' is a client library for the <code>Information Collector</code> service. It helps clients formulating queries for gCube resource descriptions, submitting them to the service, and processing their results. | The '''ic-client''' is a client library for the <code>Information Collector</code> service. It helps clients formulating queries for gCube resource descriptions, submitting them to the service, and processing their results. | ||
− | Similar facilities for resource discovery are traditionally provided by the <code>gCube Application Framework</code> (gCF) and the <code>IS Client</code> library. <code>ic-client</code> improves over the latter in a number of ways, most noticeably: | + | Similar facilities for resource discovery are traditionally provided by the <code>gCube Application Framework</code> (gCF) and the <code>IS Client</code> library. The <code>ic-client</code> improves over the latter in a number of ways, most noticeably: |
* it is completely independent from the gCore stack. | * it is completely independent from the gCore stack. | ||
− | :<code>ic-client</code> can be easily embedded in a variety of client runtimes without out-of-band | + | :the <code>ic-client</code> can be easily embedded in a variety of client runtimes without out-of-band installation or configuration requirements. Clients may be external to gCube, or they may be 2nd-generation gCube services developed and running on stacks other than gCore stack. In this sense, the <code>ic-client</code> is a key part of the [[Featherweight Stack|Featherweight Stack]] for gCube clients. |
* it helps formulating a wider range of queries based only on knowledge of resource schemas. | * it helps formulating a wider range of queries based only on knowledge of resource schemas. | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:clients can configure how results ought to be parsed, or else take direct responsibility for parsing them. For example, clients may configure their own JAXB object bindings, while preprepared bindings for whole resource descriptions or specific properties thereof are readily available. | :clients can configure how results ought to be parsed, or else take direct responsibility for parsing them. For example, clients may configure their own JAXB object bindings, while preprepared bindings for whole resource descriptions or specific properties thereof are readily available. | ||
− | <code>ic-client</code> is available in our Maven repositories with the following coordinates: | + | The <code>ic-client</code> is available in our Maven repositories with the following coordinates: |
<source lang="xml"> | <source lang="xml"> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:<code>ic- client</code> customises this layer for queries to the <code>Information Collector</code>. | :<code>ic- client</code> customises this layer for queries to the <code>Information Collector</code>. | ||
− | '''Note''': in what follows, we blur the distinction | + | '''Note''': in what follows, we blur the distinction between the <code>ic- client</code> and the <code>discovery-client</code>. The distinction reflects modular choices for the design of the library but is otherwise of little consequence for its clients. The visibility of the <code>discovery-client</code> is limited only to the package of certain components that we discuss below, which starts with <code>org.gcube.resource.discovery.client</code>. The components of the <code>ic-client</code> are instead in packages that start with <code>org.gcube.discovery.icclient</code>. |
= First Examples = | = First Examples = |
Revision as of 19:59, 23 November 2012
The ic-client is a client library for the Information Collector
service. It helps clients formulating queries for gCube resource descriptions, submitting them to the service, and processing their results.
Similar facilities for resource discovery are traditionally provided by the gCube Application Framework
(gCF) and the IS Client
library. The ic-client
improves over the latter in a number of ways, most noticeably:
- it is completely independent from the gCore stack.
- the
ic-client
can be easily embedded in a variety of client runtimes without out-of-band installation or configuration requirements. Clients may be external to gCube, or they may be 2nd-generation gCube services developed and running on stacks other than gCore stack. In this sense, theic-client
is a key part of the Featherweight Stack for gCube clients.
- it helps formulating a wider range of queries based only on knowledge of resource schemas.
- simple queries can be configured with custom namespaces and custom result expressions. As a result, clients can retrieve only parts of resource descriptions or arbitrary combinations of parts. Fine-grained results are more easily processed and improve the performance of both clients and service.
- it offers increased flexibility in how query results are processed.
- clients can configure how results ought to be parsed, or else take direct responsibility for parsing them. For example, clients may configure their own JAXB object bindings, while preprepared bindings for whole resource descriptions or specific properties thereof are readily available.
The ic-client
is available in our Maven repositories with the following coordinates:
<artifactId>ic-client</artifactId> <groupId>org.gcube.resources.discovery</groupId> <version>...</version>
The library depends on a small set of components of the Featherweight Stack. Among these, the following are visible to library clients:
-
common-gcore-resources
: the object-based implementation of the gCube resource model.
- clients may and normally will use the classes in
common-gcore-resources
to parse and process query results.
-
discovery-client
: a layer of interfaces and abstract implementations for queries and query submission API.
ic- client
customises this layer for queries to theInformation Collector
.
Note: in what follows, we blur the distinction between the ic- client
and the discovery-client
. The distinction reflects modular choices for the design of the library but is otherwise of little consequence for its clients. The visibility of the discovery-client
is limited only to the package of certain components that we discuss below, which starts with org.gcube.resource.discovery.client
. The components of the ic-client
are instead in packages that start with org.gcube.discovery.icclient
.
First Examples
We introduce the ic-client
API with a first example that shows how to submit a query for endpoints of generic services:
import static org.gcube.resources.discovery.icclient.ICFactory.*; ... Query query = queryFor(ServiceEndpoint.class); DiscoveryClient<ServiceEndpoint> client = clientFor(ServiceEndpoint.class); List<ServiceEndpoint> resources = client.execute(query);
queryFor()
and clientFor
are static factory methods of the ICFactory
class, which we import. The first method gives us a pre-prepared Query
for service endpoints, which we invoke with the corresponding resource class of the resource model in common-gcore-resources
. Similarly, the second method gives us a DiscoveryClient
which can execute the query. Again, we specialise the client to bind the results of the query to instances of the ServiceEndpoint
class. Finally, we ask the client to execute the query, collecting the parsed results.
In the following example, we refine the query to filter out some service endpoints and return only their addresses. We also specify that results will not need parsing:
import static org.gcube.resources.discovery.icclient.ICFactory.*; ... SimpleXQuery query = queryFor(ServiceEndpoint.class); query.addCondition("$resource/Profile/Category/text() eq 'Database'"); query.setResult("$resource/Profile/AccessPoint/Interface/Endpoint/text()"); DiscoveryClient<String> client = client(); List<String> addresses = client.execute(query);
Once again we obtain a pre-defined query for service endpoints, but this type we type it under a more specific interface, SimpleXQuery
, which enables customisations. We first add an XQuery condition -- the query language of the Information Collector
-- which filters out endpoints that do not give access to databases. We then customise the result expression to get back only their addresses. In both cases, we rely on the resource schema for service endpoints to formulate expressions, and convene to use $resource
as a variable to range over target resources. We remain otherwise oblivious to the structure of the XML database in which the Information Collector
keeps resource descriptions.
In the next example, we focus on larger portions of service endpoints and retrieve not only addresses but all the information available about access. Hence we reverse to parsing, but pass this time no kore and no less than the JAXB class of the resource model that binds to the retrieved portion of resources:
import static org.gcube.resources.discovery.icclient.ICFactory.*; ... SimpleXQuery query = queryFor(ServiceEndpoint.class); query.addCondition("$resource/Profile/Category/text() eq 'Database'"); query.setResult("$resource/Profile/AccessPoint"); DiscoveryClient<AccessPoint> client = client(AccessPoint.class); List<AccessPoint> accesspoints = client.execute(query); for (AccessPoint point : accesspoints) { ...point.name()....point.address().... }
Finally, we show how different parts of service endpoint descriptions, such as access points and identifiers, can be composed together and conveniently parsed:
import static org.gcube.resources.discovery.icclient.ICFactory.*; ... SimpleXQuery query = queryFor(ServiceEndpoint.class); query.addCondition("$resource/Profile/Category/text() eq 'Database'"); query.setResult("<perfect>" + "<id>{$resource/ID/text()}</id>" + "{$resource/Profile/AccessPoint}" + "</perfect>"); DiscoveryClient<PerfectResult> client = clientFor(PerfectResult.class); List<PerfectResult> results = client.execute(query); for (PerfectResult result : results) { ...result.id...result.ap); }
where PerfectResult
is the simple bean defined as:
@XmlRootElement(name="perfect") class PerfectResult { @XmlElement(name="id") String id; @XmlElementRef AccessPoint ap; }
Here the results have custom shape hence we take responsibility for producing what is to us the perfect result binding, i.e. the binding that makes it easiest for us to work with results. We declare the binding as a JAXB-annotated bean which reuses similar beans defined in common-gcore-resources
as part of the resource model. We then pass the bean the discovery client after having customised the result expression to return the XML serialisations of the bean.